Brooklyn since 2014All five boroughsSame-day response during business hours

What is NYC ZR § 62-913?

Quick Answer

This section outlines the conditions that the City Planning Commission must find to approve a Waterfront Access Plan. The plan must enhance public use of the waterfront and meet specific criteria related to public access, unique shore conditions, and visual relationships with upland streets. Applies to waterfront development projects requiring City Planning Commission approval.

General informational summary. Not legal advice for your situation. Consult an attorney before acting on any specific matter.

Michael Nacmias - Founding PartnerMichael Sargo - Partner
From the team atNacmias Law Firm, PLLCBrooklyn-based attorneys representingproperty owners across all five boroughsMeet the team →

§ 62-913 Conditions for adoption of a Waterfront Access Plan

ZR § 62-913

As a condition precedent to its approval of a Waterfront Access Plan, the City Planning Commission shall find, in its report to the City Council for adoption, that such plan:

(a)would improve public use and enjoyment of the waterfront, thereby serving to implement the goals set forth in Section 62-00; and

(b)meets any of the following:

(1)is necessary to link public parks or other public areas along the waterfront or to the waterfront, and such linkage would not necessarily be achieved solely by the provisions of Sections 62-34 (Height and Setback Regulations on Waterfront Blocks), 62-50 (GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR VISUAL CORRIDORS AND WATERFRONT PUBLIC ACCESS AREAS) and 62-60 (DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR WATERFRONT PUBLIC ACCESS AREAS);

(2)is necessary to accommodate unique shore conditions or the retention of existing buildings or other structures, including bridges, viaducts or railways that would not be adequately accommodated by the provisions of Sections 62-50 and 62-60;

(3)is necessary to accommodate unique topography or natural features, such as wetlands conditions, significant grade changes, geologic formations, natural vegetation or wildlife habitats, which natural features or topography would not be adequately accommodated by the provisions of Sections 62-34, 62-50 and 62-60;

(4)is necessary to create a better physical or visual relationship of the waterfront to significant upland streets or preserves significant views of the water or historic structures from such streets, which would not necessarily be achieved by the provisions of Sections 62-34, 62-50 and 62-60;

(5)is necessary to achieve public access to the waterfront in an area characterized by large undeveloped tracts of land with a limited number of public streets leading to the shore;

(6)is necessary to maintain visual corridors that would be extinguished by a street de-mapping after October 25, 1993, or maintains visual corridors from certain upland streets that would be exempted from such requirements as the result of an intervening street mapping after October 25, 1993; or

(7)is necessary to retain the bulk regulations of Section 62-30 on certain blocks that would be exempted from such requirements as the result of an intervening street mapping after October 25, 1993.

Common Questions

Our team

Meet the people you will work with

Free case review

Talk to an attorney before you act on NYC code.

Free 15-minute case review with the attorney handling your matter. Same-day response during business hours across all five boroughs — OATH hearings, Housing Court, and real estate closings.

Or email us

[email protected]

An attorney reads every message.

  • Same-day response

    During business hours

  • Direct attorney access

    Same lawyer from intake to close

  • Flat-fee pricing

    On most OATH and closing matters