Brooklyn since 2014All five boroughsSame-day response during business hours

What is NYC AC § 27-2146?

Quick Answer

This section outlines the grounds for challenging the validity of a lien in enforcement or discharge proceedings. It specifies that challenges cannot be based on the lawfulness of work done or the accuracy of claimed expenses, and only property owners or certain lienors may contest liens. Applies to property owners and lienors involved in lien disputes.

General informational summary. Not legal advice for your situation. Consult an attorney before acting on any specific matter.

Michael Nacmias - Founding PartnerMichael Sargo - Partner
From the team atNacmias Law Firm, PLLCBrooklyn-based attorneys representingproperty owners across all five boroughsMeet the team →

§ 27-2146 Validity of lien; grounds for challenge.

AC § 27-2146

a. In any proceedings to enforce or discharge the lien, the validity of the lien shall not be subject to challenge based on: (1) The lawfulness of the repair or other work done; or (2) The propriety and accuracy of the expense for which a lien is claimed, except as provided in this section. b. No challenge may be made except by (1) the owner of the property, or (2) a mortgagee or lienor whose mortgage or lien would, but for the provisions of section 27-2144 of this article, have priority over the department's lien. c. An issue specified in subdivision a which was decided, or could have been contested, in a prior court proceeding to secure a court order to repair under article five of this subchapter or to secure the appointment or the discharge of a receiver under article six of this subchapter, shall not be open to reexamination, but if any mortgagee or lienor entitled to notice of such prior proceeding was not served and did not appear therein, his or her mortgage or lien shall have priority over the lien of the department. In addition to this limitation, an owner who has been served with a statement pursuant to section 27-2129 of article five of this subchapter, or his successor in interest, may not subsequently contest the expense contained therein unless such owner or successor in interest notified the department in writing of his or her objection to the statement of account in the manner and within the time period provided in section 27-2129 of article five of this subchapter. d. With respect to any issue specified in subdivision a which is not subject to subdivision c, the statement of the department made pursuant to section 27-2145 of this article shall be presumptive evidence of the facts stated therein.

Common Questions

Our team

Meet the people you will work with

Free case review

Have a matter that touches § 27-2146?

Free 15-minute case review with the attorney handling your matter. Same-day response during business hours across all five boroughs — OATH hearings, Housing Court, and real estate closings.

Or email us

[email protected]

An attorney reads every message.

  • Same-day response

    During business hours

  • Direct attorney access

    Same lawyer from intake to close

  • Flat-fee pricing

    On most OATH and closing matters