Brooklyn since 2014All five boroughsSame-day response during business hours

What is NYC AC § 19-1003?

Quick Answer

This section allows an administrative law judge or hearing officer to reduce penalties for certain violations if compelling circumstances demonstrate that the penalty would result in injustice. The decision takes into account various factors, including the seriousness of the violation and its impact on the community. Applies to respondents facing penalties set by the commission.

General informational summary. Not legal advice for your situation. Consult an attorney before acting on any specific matter.

Michael Nacmias - Founding PartnerMichael Sargo - Partner
From the team atNacmias Law Firm, PLLCBrooklyn-based attorneys representingproperty owners across all five boroughsMeet the team →

§ 19-1003 Administrative law judge and hearing officer discretion to reduce commission penalties.

AC § 19-1003

a. If an administrative law judge or hearing officer finds a violation, except for a violation under section 19-507, such administrative law judge or hearing officer may, in the interest of justice, and upon the petition of the respondent, reduce the penalty for such violation set by the commission after determining that such reduction is appropriate because one or more compelling considerations or circumstances clearly demonstrates that imposing such penalty would constitute or result in injustice. In determining whether such compelling consideration or circumstance exists, the administrative law judge or hearing officer shall, to the extent applicable, consider, individually and collectively, the following factors: 1. The seriousness and circumstances of the violation; 2. The extent of harm caused by the violation; 3. The evidence supporting or refuting the violation charged, whether admissible or inadmissible at a hearing; 4. The history, character and condition of the respondent; 5. The effect of imposing upon the respondent the penalty set by the commission; 6. The impact of a penalty reduction on the safety or welfare of the community; 7. The impact of a penalty reduction on public confidence in the commission, the office of administrative trials and hearings and the implementation of laws by the city; 8. The position of the petitioner regarding the proposed fine reduction with reference to the specific circumstances of the respondent and the violation charged; and 9. Any other relevant fact indicating whether a decision to impose the penalty set by the commission on the respondent would serve a useful purpose. b. Upon determining that a penalty for a violation set by the commission should be reduced, the administrative law judge or hearing officer shall set forth the amount and the reasons for such reduction in the record. Such reasons and determination shall be transmitted to the chairperson of the commission. c. Within 20 business days of receipt of such reasons and determination, pursuant to subdivision b, the commission, or the chairperson of the commission acting pursuant to rules of the commission, may, in the commission or chairperson's discretion, remove such reduction if the commission or chairperson determines such a reduction would not be in the interests of justice, pursuant to the factors in subdivision a, or lower such reduction. (L.L. 2019/019, 1/20/2019, eff. 7/19/2019)

Common Questions

Our team

Meet the people you will work with

Free case review

Talk to an attorney before you act on NYC code.

Free 15-minute case review with the attorney handling your matter. Same-day response during business hours across all five boroughs — OATH hearings, Housing Court, and real estate closings.

Or email us

[email protected]

An attorney reads every message.

  • Same-day response

    During business hours

  • Direct attorney access

    Same lawyer from intake to close

  • Flat-fee pricing

    On most OATH and closing matters